FRA_2014_FIES_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
DDI_FRA_2014_FIES_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_FAO
Office of the Chief Statistician
Nesstar Publisher
FRA_2014_FIES_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_v01
Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)
FIES
FRA_2014_FIES_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
FAO Statistics Division
Nesstar Publisher
FAO Statistics Division
Socio-Economic/Monitoring Survey [hh/sems]
Food Insecurity
SDG
SDGs
Food Access
France
National
Individuals
Individuals of 15 years or older.
Sample survey data [ssd]
Last 12 months.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
Statistical validation assesses the quality of the FIES data collected by testing their consistency with the assumptions of the Rasch model. This analysis involves the interpretation of several statistics that reveal 1) items that do not perform well in a given context, 2) cases with highly erratic response patterns, 3) pairs of items that may be redundant, and 4) the proportion of total variance in the population that is accounted for by the measurement model.
As part of the statistical disclosure control process, values for number of children and number of adults that were 10 or above, were recoded as "10+" and categories for area were combined into "urban/suburbs" and "towns/rural".
To use updated computed variables, users should merge the external resource NEW_Computed_Variables_France.csv to the original data set through the key Random_ID
The users shall not take any action with the purpose of identifying any individual entity (i.e. person, household, enterprise, etc.) in the micro dataset(s). If such a disclosure is made inadvertently, no use will be made of the information, and it will be reported immediately to FAO.
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
FRA_2014_FIES_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS.NSDstat
This dataset contains the variables used to calculate the FIES-based indicator, deomographic variables and some derived variables calculated by FAO from the survey.
1000
23
Nesstar 200801
Unique respondent identifier
1000
0
111221285
211027258
161418879.938
28508503.038
Worried you would not have enough food to eat because of a lack of money or other resources
997
3
0
No
906
1
Yes
91
Sysmiss
3
Unable to eat healthy and nutritious food because of a lack of money or other resources
998
2
0
No
937
1
Yes
61
Sysmiss
2
Ate only a few kinds of foods because of a lack of money or other resources
995
5
0
No
923
1
Yes
72
Sysmiss
5
Skipped a meal because there was not enough money or other resources to get food
994
6
0
No
955
1
Yes
39
Sysmiss
6
Ate less than you thought you should because of a lack of money or other resources
995
5
0
No
932
1
Yes
63
Sysmiss
5
Household ran out of food because of a lack of money or other resources
994
6
0
No
937
1
Yes
57
Sysmiss
6
Hungry but did not eat because there was not enough money or other resources for food?
993
7
0
No
962
1
Yes
31
Sysmiss
7
Went without eating for a whole day because of a lack of money or other resources?
996
4
0
No
978
1
Yes
18
Sysmiss
4
Post-stratification sampling weights
1000
0
0.331
3.308
1
0.765
Year when the GWP was administered in the country
1000
0
1
1
1000
Sysmiss
0
Number of adults 15 years of age and above in household
961
39
01
01
163
02
02
476
03
03
203
04
04
96
05
05
20
06
06
2
07
07
1
Sysmiss
39
Number of children under 15 years of age in household
989
11
00
00
736
01
01
138
02
02
90
03
03
20
04
04
2
05
05
2
06
06
1
Sysmiss
11
Sum of Affirmative responses to FIES questions
980
20
0
8
0.428
1.321
Estimated person parameters using the Rasch model
980
20
-2.692
3.121
-2.386
0.936
Estimated person parameter errors using the Rasch model
980
20
0.71
1.353
1.287
0.176
Probability of being moderately or severely food insecure
980
20
0
0.994
0.056
0.194
Probability of being severely food insecure
980
20
0
0.821
0.013
0.093
Age of the respondent
1000
0
16
100
48.595
17.14
Education of the respondent
1000
0
1
Elementary_or_less
80
2
Secondary
565
3
College
338
4
Dont_know
3
5
Refused
14
Sysmiss
0
Area
1000
0
1
(Refused)
2
2
Urban/Suburbs
424
3
Towns/Rural
570
4
Dont_know
4
5
Refused
0
Sysmiss
0
Gender of the respondent
1000
0
1
Male
471
2
Female
529
Sysmiss
0
Income quintile
1000
0
1
Poorest_20%
144
2
Second_20%
161
3
Middle_20%
194
4
Fourth_20%
224
5
Richest_20%
277
Sysmiss
0