{"doc_desc":{"idno":"DDI_NCL_2003-2007_SES-PROCFISH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_FAO","producers":[{"name":"Office of Chief Statistician","abbreviation":"OCS","affiliation":"Food and Agriculture Organization","role":"Metadata adapted for FAM"},{"name":"Statistics for Development Division","abbreviation":"SDD","affiliation":"Pacific Community","role":"Documentation of the study"}],"version_statement":{"version":"NCL_2003-2007_SES-PROCFISH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_v01"}},"study_desc":{"title_statement":{"idno":"NCL_2003-2007_SES-PROCFISH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS","title":"Socio-Economic Survey-PROCFish\/C 2003-2007","alt_title":"SES-PROCFISH 2003-2007"},"authoring_entity":[{"name":"Coastal Fisheries Programme","affiliation":"Pacific Community (SPC)"}],"oth_id":[{"name":"Service de la Marine Marchande et des P\u00eaches Maritimes","affiliation":"Government of New Caledonia","email":"","role":"In-country assistance"},{"name":"Provinces Sud, Nord, Iles","affiliation":"Government of New Caledonia","email":"","role":"In-country assistance"},{"name":"Direction des Ressources Naturelles Province Sud","affiliation":"Government of New Caledonia","email":"","role":"In-country assistance"},{"name":"Service de la P\u00eache de la Province Nord","affiliation":"Government of New Caledonia","email":"","role":"In-country assistance"},{"name":"WorldFish Center","affiliation":"","email":"","role":"Technical assistance"},{"name":"Institut de Recherche pour le D\u00e9veloppement","affiliation":"","email":"","role":"Technical assistance"}],"production_statement":{"producers":[{"name":"Reef Fisheries Observatory","affiliation":"","role":"Technical assistance"}],"funding_agencies":[{"name":"European Development Fund","abbreviation":"EDF","role":"Funding"}]},"distribution_statement":{"contact":[{"name":"Coastal Fisheries Programme","affiliation":"Pacific Community (SPC)","email":"","uri":"https:\/\/coastfish.spc.int\/"}]},"series_statement":{"series_name":"Socio-Economic\/Monitoring Survey [hh\/sems]","series_info":"In late 2003 - early 2004, the Pacific Community (SPC) conducted a survey of a number of pacific regional fisheries authorities to determine their views on the information that should be collected in socioeconomic surveys to support reef fisheries management. Between 2003 and 2007, PROCFish\/C project conducted fieldwork in New Caledonia in 5 different sites."},"study_info":{"keywords":[{"keyword":"Socio-economic","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Fisheries","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Finfish","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Invertebrates","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Consumption","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Subsistence","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Gift","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Sale","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Fishing techniques","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Habitat","vocab":"","uri":""}],"abstract":"The coastal component of the Pacific Regional Oceanic and Coastal Fisheries Development Programme (PROCFish\/C) conducted fieldwork in five locations around New Caledonia. As New Caledonia was the home base for the PROCFish\/C project, fieldwork was conducted site by site between fieldwork activities in other countries. Fieldwork in New Caledonia was undertaken in March, April and November 2003; January, February, April, June, August and November 2004; April and May 2005; January to March 2006; and January and February 2007. New Caledonia is one of 17 Pacific Island countries and territories being surveyed over a 5\u20136 year period by PROCFish or its associated programme CoFish (Pacific Regional Coastal Fisheries Development Programme).\n \nThe aim of the survey work was to provide baseline information on the status of reef fisheries, and to help fill the massive information gap that hinders the effective management of reef fisheries. Other programme outputs include:\n\u2022 implementation of the first comprehensive multi-country comparative assessment of reef fisheries (finfish, invertebrates and socioeconomics) ever undertaken in the Pacific Islands region using identical methodologies at each site;\n\u2022 dissemination of country reports that comprise a set of \u2018reef fisheries profiles\u2019 for the sites in each country in order to provide information for coastal fisheries development and management planning;\n\u2022 development of a set of indicators (or reference points to fishery status) to provide guidance when developing local and national reef fishery management plans and monitoring programmes; and\n\u2022 development of data and information management systems, including regional and national databases.\n\nSurvey work in New Caledonia covered three disciplines (finfish, invertebrate and socioeconomic) in each site, with sites surveyed on each trip by a team of two to five programme scientists and several local counterparts from the Fisheries department, Provinces, and Research Institute for Development (IRD). The fieldwork included capacity building for the local counterparts through instruction on survey methodologies in all three disciplines, including the collection of data and inputting the data into the programme\u2019s database.\nIn New Caledonia, the five sites selected for the survey were Ouass\u00e9, Thio, Luengoni, Oundjo and Moindou.","time_periods":[{"start":"2003-03-01","end":"2003-11-30","cycle":"Round 1"},{"start":"2004-01-01","end":"2004-11-30","cycle":"Round 2"},{"start":"2005-04-01","end":"2005-05-31","cycle":"Round 3"},{"start":"2006-01-01","end":"2006-03-31","cycle":"Round 4"},{"start":"2007-01-01","end":"2007-02-28","cycle":"Round 5"}],"coll_dates":[{"start":"2003-03-01","end":"2007-02-28","cycle":""}],"nation":[{"name":"New Caledonia","abbreviation":"NCL"}],"geog_coverage":"5 sites: Ouass\u00e9, Thio, Luengoni, Oundjo and Mouindou.","analysis_unit":"Households","universe":"The survey covered de jure household members. All household members responding the \"Finfishers\" and \"Invertebrate fishers\" questionnaires must be aged 15 years and over and must be living in the household surveyed.","data_kind":"Sample survey data [ssd]","notes":"The description of scope for the survey includes:\n\n-HOUSEHOLD: \n1. Household size and composition\n2. Ranked sources of income and average household expenditure level\n3. Average household consumption patterns and sources\n4. Average number of fishers and boats per household.\n\n-INDIVIDUAL: \n1. Education level of adult members of the household\n2. When, how often and during which months of the year fishers go out to particular habitats\n3. Average catch size\n4. Catch composition\n5. Fishing techniques\n6. Proportion of the catch targeted for subsistence, gift and sale, and preservation\n7. How finfish and invertebrates are preserved\n8. Community's fishing grounds\n9. Management rules\n10. Major problems relating to the use\/management of the community's marine resources\n11. Quantities by species or groups marketed\n12. Quality and processing level of species marketed\n13. Price in local currency\/USD\n14. Client groups\n15. Quantitative and qualitative changes in marketing perceived over a period of time."},"method":{"data_collection":{"data_collectors":[{"name":"Coastal Fisheries Programme","abbreviation":"CFP","affiliation":"Pacific Community (SPC)"},{"name":"National fisheries authority","abbreviation":"","affiliation":"Government of New Caledonia"}],"sampling_procedure":"At each site the extent of the community to be covered by the socioeconomic survey is determined by the size, nature and use of the fishing grounds. This selection process is highly dependent on local marine tenure rights. For example, in the case of community-owned fishing rights, a fishing community includes all villages that have access to a particular fishing ground. If the fisheries of all the villages concerned are comparable, one or two villages may be selected as representative samples, and consequently surveyed. Results will then be extrapolated to include all villages accessing the same fishing grounds under the same marine tenure system.\n\nMost of the households included in the survey are chosen by simple random selection, as are the finfish and invertebrate fishers associated with any of these households. In addition, important participants in one or several particular fisheries may be selected for complementary surveying. Random sampling is used to provide an average and representative picture of the fishery situation in each community, including those who do not fish, those engaged in finfish and\/or invertebrate fishing for subsistence, and those engaged in fishing activities on a small-scale artisanal basis. This assumption applies provided that selected communities are mostly traditional, relatively small (~100-300 households) and (from a socioeconomic point of view) largely homogenous. Similarly, gender and participation patterns (types of fishers by gender and fishery) revealed through the surveys are assumed to be representative of the entire community. Accordingly, harvest figures reported by male and female fishers participating in a community's various fisheries may be extrapolated to assess the impacts resulting from the entire community, sample size permitting (at least 25-30% of all households).","coll_mode":"Face-to-face paper [f2f]","research_instrument":"The questionnaires are designed to allow a minimum dataset to be developed for each site, one that allows:\n\u2022 the community\u2019s dependency on marine resources to be characterised;\n\u2022 assessment of the community\u2019s engagement in and the possible impact of finfish and invertebrate harvesting; and\n\u2022 comparison of socioeconomic information with data collected through PROCFish\/C resource surveys. \n\nThe questionnaires are divided into 4 main areas:\n-Household Survey => incorporating demographics, selected socioeconomic parameters and consumption patterns;\n-Survey of fishers (finfish and invertebrate) => incorporating data by habitat and\/or specific fishery;\n-A general questionnaire targeting key informants => the purpose of which is to assess the overall characteristics of the site's fisheries;\n-Finfish and invertebrate marketing questionnaires => that target agents, middlemen or buyers\/sellers (shops and markets).\n\nIn addition to the questionnaires, two sets of size charts are provided to help assess the weight of fish and invertebrates caught and consumed. This is necessary as most village fishers do not use kilograms but local units of measure (heaps, plastic bags, strings, baskets, etc.), which are difficult to translate into kilogram weights.\n\nData collection is performed using a standard set of questionnaires developed by PROCFish\/C\u2019s socioeconomic component, which include a household survey (key socioeconomic parameters and consumption patterns), finfish fisheries survey, invertebrate fisheries survey, marketing of finfish survey, marketing of invertebrates survey, and general information questionnaire (for key informants). In addition, further observations and relevant details are noted and recorded in a non-standardised format. \nQuestionnaires are fully structured and closed, although open questions may be added on a case-to-case situation.","coll_situation":"DATA COLLECTION:\nIf translation is required, each interview is conducted jointly by the leader of the project's socioeconomic team and the local counterpart. In cases where no translation is needed, the project's socioeconomist may work individually. Selected interviews may be conducted by trainees receiving advanced field training, but trainees are monitored by project staff in case clarification or support is needed.\n\nMost of the data are collected in the context of face-to-face interviews. Names of people interviewed are recorded on each questionnaire to facilitate cross-identification of fishers and households during data collection and to ensure that each fisher interview is complemented by a household interview. Linking data from household and fishery surveys is essential to permit joint data analysis. However, all names are suppressed once the data entry has been finalised, and thus the information provided by respondents remains anonymous. \n\nTeam members should be familiar with the objectives of the survey, their role in it, and the survey\u2019s contribution to resource management. They will need to understand the relationship, importance and content of the entire set of questionnaires to ensure that data collected are relevant, reliable and accurate. The tasks to be undertaken by each team member should be well defined and agreed on in advance. It is also very important that the survey team members are interested in meeting members of local communities, that they are patient in posing the same questions over and over again, and that they can listen to and engage with local people in an easy and understandable communication process that is free of manipulation.\n\nThe project utilises a \u2018snapshot approach\u2019 that provides 5\u20137 working days per site (with four sites per country). This timeframe generally allows about 25 households (and a corresponding number of associated finfish and invertebrate fishers) to be covered by the survey. The total number of finfish and invertebrate fishers interviewed also depends on the complexity of the fisheries practised by a particular community, the degree to which both sexes are engaged in finfish and invertebrate fisheries, and the size of the total target population. Data from finfish and invertebrate fisher interviews are grouped by habitat and fishery, respectively. Thus, the project\u2019s time and budget and the complexity of a particular site\u2019s fisheries are what determine the level of data representation: the larger the population and the number of fishers, and the more diversified the finfish and invertebrate fisheries, the lower the level of representation that can be achieved. \n\nThe interviews were done jointly by Pacific Commmunity (SPC)'s Coastal Fisheries Programme and the territorial fisheries authority of New Caledonia.\n\nNEGOTIATION:\nA survey cannot begin or be implemented without the consent and cooperation of the target community(ies). It is advisable to identify in advance how to approach communities, keep them informed, and ensure their ownership of the data. One of the major responsibilities of the team leader is to approach the target communities in the early stages to inform them about the scope and objectives of the survey planned and the reason for selecting the respective community(ies). The team leader must request their agreement to participate and, more importantly, gain their full support for, and engagement in the exercise. The survey team members must also be aware of local customs and cultural protocols and proceed accordingly. \nThe community needs to be fully informed of:\n-the reason for and objectives of the survey;\n-the contribution required from the community;\n-how the data will be collected;\n-how the data will be used;\n-who will be responsible for data management; and\n-in what form and when results and possible recommendations will be returned to the government authorities and community(ies) concerned.\n\nPILOT TEST:\nThe proposed methods, approaches and questionnaires are the result of tests carried out and experience gained within the framework of two long-term projects implemented by SPC\u2019s Reef Fishery Observatory.\nPilot testing for methods, approach and questionnaires are therefore not obligatory. Pilot testing may, however, be performed so as to familiarise and\/or train survey team members, and decide on the most appropriate language, and way of approaching the target community and conducting individual interviews.\nIt should be borne in mind that the questions provided in the questionnaires are a reminder of what data is needed. The sequence of questions is put into a logical order according to the information requirements prioritised. The sequence and\/or way questions are finally formulated and posed may vary according to the situation, the interviewer and the respondent.","act_min":"The team leader should follow up on data gaps identified after filling in the checklist and assign tasks for collecting the missing data accordingly. Most of this missing data should be collected during survey implementation in the respective community(ies).","cleaning_operations":"A software programme (SEMCoS) has been developed in tandem with the manual to assist in automatically performing all necessary analysis and producing outputs for the data collected."},"analysis_info":{"data_appraisal":"Data from all questionnaire forms are entered in the Reef Fisheries Integrated Database (RFID) system. All data entered are first verified and 'cleaned' prior to analysis. In the process of data entry, a comprehensive list of vernacular and corresponding scientific names for finfish and invertebrate species is developed.\nDatabase queries have been defined and established that allow automatic retrieval of the descriptive statistics used when summarising results at the site and national levels."}},"data_access":{"dataset_use":{"conf_dec":[{"txt":"The Pacific Data Hub - Microdata Library, is responsible for improving the accessibility and availability of datasets and promoting new ways of using and reusing data for current and future use. These datasets have been modified in such a way that the possibility of identifying individuals or households is minimised. \nThey are made available to individual researchers, universities and research institutions subject to a number of conditions known as Terms of Use. (See https:\/\/microdata.pacificdata.org\/index.php\/terms-of-use).","required":"yes","form_no":"","uri":""}],"contact":[{"name":"Coastal Fisheries Programmes","affiliation":"Pacific Community (SPC)","email":"","uri":"https:\/\/coastfish.spc.int\/"}],"cit_req":"\"Pacific Community's Coastal Fisheries Programme, New Caledonia PROCFish\/C - Socio-Economic survey 2003-2007 (SE-PROCFISH 2003), Version 01 of the public-use dataset (2007), provided by the Microdata Library. https:\/\/microdata.pacificdata.org\/index.php\/home\"","conditions":"Public-use file, accessible to all.","disclaimer":"The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses."}}},"schematype":"survey"}