Rural Capacity Building Project, Baseline Survey 2009
Ethiopia, 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ETH_2009_RCBP-BS_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Producer(s)
Tigist Ketema, Niklas Buehren
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Sep 10, 2020
Last modified
Nov 08, 2022
Page views
48859
Downloads
258
- Data files
- IDENTI_1
- Section_A
- Section_B
- Section_C
- Section_C_Consumption
- Section_C2
- D0_D3
- D4_16
- D6_Head
- D6_Spouse
- D8_Head
- D8_Spouse
- D10_H
- D10_S
- D12_H
- D12_S
- D14_H
- D14_S
- D16_H
- D16_S
- D17_D
- D19_H
- D19_S
- D24_D65
- D31_Head
- D31_Spouse
- D37_Head
- D37_Spouse
- D41_Head
- D41_Spouse
- D47_Head
- D47_Spouse
- D48_Head
- D48_Spouse
- D49_Head
- D49_Spouse
- D51_Head
- D51_Spouse
- E1_E2
- E3_E9
- E9
- E10_E19
- E20_E27
- E28_E36
- F0
- F1_F22
- F23_F30
- Farm Input
d61. if no, why haven_t you used a technology you saw at a frg/freg activity or (h_d61)
Data file: D24_D65
Overview
Valid:
43
Invalid:
1566
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
137
End:
137
Width:
1
Range:
1 - 8
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Section D: Access to Agricultural Extension Services
D61. (Head of Household) If no, why haven’t you used a technology you saw at a FRG/FREG activity or field day?
D61. (Head of Household) If no, why haven’t you used a technology you saw at a FRG/FREG activity or field day?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wasn_t appropriate technically | 3 |
7%
|
| 2 | didn_t make sense economically | 2 |
4.7%
|
| 3 | wasn_t socially appropriate | 0 |
0%
|
| 4 | unaffordable | 5 |
11.6%
|
| 5 | unavailable | 9 |
20.9%
|
| 6 | other | 3 |
7%
|
| 7 | i haven_t seen new technologies | 20 |
46.5%
|
| 8 | the climate is not conducive | 1 |
2.3%
|
| Sysmiss | 1566 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Others
Notes
61. If no, why haven_t you used a technology you saw at a FRG/FREG activity or field day? /Head HH