Land and Soil Experimental Research 2013
Ethiopia, 2013
Get Microdata
Reference ID
ETH_2013_LSER_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Producer(s)
Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Sep 23, 2020
Last modified
Nov 08, 2022
Page views
15136
Downloads
136
- Data files
- Crop_Cutting
- PH_Cover_Page
- PH1_Household_Member_R
- PH2_1_Field_Roster
- PH2_Harvest
- PH3_Crop_Disposition
- PH4_Harvest_Labor
- Cover_Page
- PP1_HH_Roster
- PP2_Assets
- PP3_Livestock
- PP4_Parcel_Roster
- PP5_Field_Roster
- PP6_Field_Details
- PP7_Crop_Details
- PP8_Filed_Selection
- PP9_1_CR
- PP9_1_IN_FIELD_MEASUREMENT
- PP9_2_CR
- PP9_2_IN_Field_Measurement
- LASER_SoilResults_V2_Ensemble
Whatproportion of [crop] grown by household was used for sales? (ph3_19c)
Data file: PH3_Crop_Disposition
Overview
Valid:
3930
Invalid:
0
Minimum:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
185
End:
187
Width:
3
Range:
0 - 100
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
What proportion of [crop] grown by household was used for or expected to be used for sales?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2443 |
62.2%
|
|
| 4 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 5 | 11 |
0.3%
|
|
| 6 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 7 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 8 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 10 | 90 |
2.3%
|
|
| 13 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 15 | 21 |
0.5%
|
|
| 16 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 18 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 20 | 112 |
2.8%
|
|
| 22 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 23 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 24 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 25 | 50 |
1.3%
|
|
| 26 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 27 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 28 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 29 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 30 | 132 |
3.4%
|
|
| 32 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 34 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 35 | 18 |
0.5%
|
|
| 36 | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| 37 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 38 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 40 | 114 |
2.9%
|
|
| 41 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 42 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 43 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 44 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 45 | 16 |
0.4%
|
|
| 48 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 49 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 50 | 227 |
5.8%
|
|
| 52 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 54 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 55 | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| 56 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 59 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 60 | 86 |
2.2%
|
|
| 62 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 63 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 64 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 65 | 17 |
0.4%
|
|
| 66 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 67 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 68 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 70 | 78 |
2%
|
|
| 71 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 72 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 73 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 74 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 75 | 43 |
1.1%
|
|
| 77 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 78 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 79 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 80 | 101 |
2.6%
|
|
| 81 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 82 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 83 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 84 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 85 | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| 86 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 87 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 88 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 90 | 92 |
2.3%
|
|
| 91 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 92 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 94 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 95 | 22 |
0.6%
|
|
| 98 | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| 99 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 100 | 154 |
3.9%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.