Good Growth Plan, 2014-2016
Australia, 2014 - 2016
Get Microdata
Reference ID
AUS_2014-2016_GGP-P_v01_EN_M_A_OCS
Producer(s)
Syngenta
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Feb 16, 2021
Last modified
Feb 16, 2021
Page views
8853
Downloads
278
Q399. Please explain why you follow or do not follow the crop program and/or recommendations. (q399)
Data file: global_farm_data_country_AUS
Overview
Valid:
81
Type:
Discrete
Width:
200
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | 27 |
33.3%
|
|
| ADJUST METHODS AND KEEP ASSESSING CROP ACCORDING TO CONDITIONS HE IS THE EXPERT 75 AGRO AND 25 MYSELF | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| ADJUST METHODS SEASONALLY ACCORDINGLY HE IS THE EXPERT | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| AGRONOMIST IS A TRAINED PROFESSIONAL WHO IS PAID FOR THE EXPERTISE | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| As for B1 | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| BECAUSE THE AGRONOMIST KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT AND WE CAN SEE THE SENSE IN THE PLAN | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| BEST ADVICE/ BEST CHANCE OF SUCCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| BEST CHEMICAL ADVICE TO KILL WEEDS TO INCREASE YIELD | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| BEST PRACTICE | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| CAUSE THATS THE RECOMMENDATION BASED ON THE DATA | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| CHEMICAL ADVICE TO KILL WEEDS TO INCREASE YIELD | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DUE TO THE CONDITIONS THIS SEASON RYE GRASS NUMBERS WERE LOW, THUS NO AXIAL NEEDED. TIGHT FINISH TO SEASON THUS NO FUNGICIDE (AMISTAR XTRA)NEEDED | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| GOT THE TRAINING SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION THEY HAVE THE KNOW HOW | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| HE IS OUR LOCAL AGRONOMIST AND WE USE HIM TO HELP US WITH THE NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CROPS AND ALSO WEED CONTROL, AND OVERALL HEALTH OF THE CROPS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| HE IS OUR LOCAL AGRONOMIST AND WE USE HIM TO HELP US WITH THE NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CROPS AND ALSO WEED CONTROL, AND OVERALL HEALTH OF THE CROPS. | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| I HAVE A PAID AGRONOMIST TO ASSIST IN DECISION MAKING FOR IMPUTS, TIMING, PRODUCTS USED. ALTHOUGH I HAVE THE FINAL SAY. | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| I HAVE A PAID CONSULTANT AND I TRUST HIM TO MAXIMISE YIELD | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| I'M PAYING ADVICE THEY HAVE MORE TECHNICAL BROADER KNOWLEDGE. PAY AGRONOMIST TO DO TASKS I HAVEN'T GOT TIME TO DO | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| I'M PAYING ADVICE THEY HAVE MORE TECHNICAL BROADER KNOWLEDGE. PAY AGRONOMIST TO DO TASKS I HAVN'T GOT TIME TO DO | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| Not sur what program you mean | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| Not sure what protocol you mean | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| Nothing unusual eventuated that we had to address | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| RECOMMENDATION FROM CROP PRODUCTION ADVISORS AND I USE YIELD PROFIT WHICH IS ONLINE CROP PRODUCTION MODEL | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| RIGHT ADVICE = BEST RESULT | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| SEEMS TO WORK | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| Standard practice | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| THOUGHT IT WOULD PROVIDE US WITH THE BEST RESULTS. WANTED TO SEE IF SYNGENTA'S PROTOCOL WORKED TO COMPARE WITH OUR PREVIOUS PROTOCOL. | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| Timing | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| USING CHEMICALS THAT THEY ADVISE. RELYING ON THEIR KNOWLEDGE. | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| We developed the strategy with the consultant and agree with the strategies | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| We follow our consultants recomendations all the time. | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| We followed our plan with minor changes, adjusting chemicals to suit the target weeds and increased the amount of fertiliser with the growing potential of the season. | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| We take an active role in writing the protocol and believe in Syngenta products | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| YOU CAN BE AN EXPERT IN EVERY FIELD | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| allows for better timing of operations and triggers of what needs to be done and when. | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| easier for mgt to follow a guideline, also with family operation it makes it easier to follow the plan set out as it allows for everyone to know what is going on. However with farming we need to be fl | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| i HAVE A PAID CONSULTANT AND I TRUST HIM TO MAXIMISE YIELD | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| make a plan and stick to it | 2 |
2.5%
|
|
| the crop plan covered all that had to be done in the season | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| weed issues | 2 |
2.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.