Home / Food and Agriculture Microdata Catalogue / AGRICULTURAL-SURVEYS / CHN_2014-2019_GGP-P_V01_EN_M_A_OCS / variable [F11]
agricultural-surveys

Good Growth Plan, 2014-2019

China, 2014 - 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
CHN_2014-2019_GGP-P_v01_EN_M_A_OCS
Producer(s)
Syngenta
Collections
Agricultural Surveys
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Feb 16, 2021
Last modified
Feb 16, 2021
Page views
13540
Downloads
737

Q399. Please explain why you follow or do not follow the crop program and/or recommendations. (q399)

Data file: global_farm_data_country_CHN

Overview

Valid: 762
Type: Discrete
Width: 146
Range: -
Format: character

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category Cases
According to practical situation 1
0.1%
According to previous experiences,Syngenta protocol bring benefit to farmers 2
0.3%
After the recommendation, we use it. 4
0.5%
Agricultural consultants have scientific basis 2
0.3%
Applying fertilizer 2
0.3%
Applying pesticides and field management were followed the protocol. 2
0.3%
Because all of us follow this protocol. 8
1%
Because everyone use this way. 2
0.3%
Because of enthusiasm, standard operating procedures 1
0.1%
Because the agricultual consultant has recommened it, I just ust it. 4
0.5%
Because the agriculture consult explains it reasonably, and we always do it like this. 4
0.5%
Because the agriculture consultant adviced it 4
0.5%
Because the agriculture consultant recommends it, we follow this way. 2
0.3%
Because the plant proposal adviced by agriculture consultant is scientific 2
0.3%
Because the plant proposal adviced by agriculture consultant is scientific ,and we follow this all the time 2
0.3%
Because the yield is high 2
0.3%
Because there are technicians to do the test, more scientific 1
0.1%
Because there is technician. 1
0.1%
Because what the agricultual consultant said is reasonable, and we also do it in this way before. 2
0.3%
Beneficial reference 2
0.3%
Benefit is good 2
0.3%
Calaris was too expensive 1
0.1%
Can bring high yield 2
0.3%
Can grow potato scientifically,ensure the quality and yield 2
0.3%
Can improve the yield 2
0.3%
Can reduce pest and disease 6
0.8%
Do new trail 1
0.1%
Doubtful 2
0.3%
Effective,scientific 1
0.1%
Every one says it is good. 2
0.3%
Everyone does it like this. 2
0.3%
Everyone follows this proposal. 2
0.3%
Everyone is using this protocol. 2
0.3%
Everyone says it is good. 2
0.3%
Everyone thinks this proposal is good 2
0.3%
Everyone use this proposal 1
0.1%
Everyone uses this proposal 3
0.4%
Follow as it's professional. 2
0.3%
Follow the protocol and it can improve the yield. 1
0.1%
Follow the solution can make soil more healthy and productive, but at a higher cost. 2
0.3%
Free 2
0.3%
Full compliance with the recommendations is too costly and costs will increase, but the recommendations are still very scientific. 2
0.3%
Good 4
0.5%
Good for harvest 2
0.3%
Good for high yield 2
0.3%
Good for the soil,can earn money 2
0.3%
Good for the soil,the yield is high 2
0.3%
Good program 2
0.3%
Good, effective 1
0.1%
Harvest 1
0.1%
Have free trial activity 2
0.3%
He has cultivation knowledge,he can help me increase the yield and farm scientifically 2
0.3%
He has technology. I believe farming scientifically 2
0.3%
He is a technicia,He has knowledge,and can increase the yield 2
0.3%
He is a technician,and knows how to apply farming technology 2
0.3%
Hope to increase output. 1
0.1%
I adjust according to practical situation 2
0.3%
I always do it in this way. 4
0.5%
I always do it like this. 2
0.3%
I always grow it like this and needn't any protocol. 2
0.3%
I always use my own way to grow. 2
0.3%
I believe farming scientificaaly, I dare to try,in fact the effect is good, the yield has improved as well as quality 2
0.3%
I chose part of it. 2
0.3%
I didn't use all recommended pesticides. 2
0.3%
I don't believe it. 1
0.1%
I feel it is good 2
0.3%
I feel some protocols are not suitable for me 1
0.1%
I follow because I feel I can get benifit 4
0.5%
I follow because I feel it is good 2
0.3%
I followed both solution and my own experience. 2
0.3%
I grow less potato 2
0.3%
I had followed the protocol to cover film. 1
0.1%
I have decades of experience in farming. 2
0.3%
I have grown for a long time and I know how to grow it. 2
0.3%
I have grown the crops for such a long time and I know how to grow. 2
0.3%
I have my own experience 1
0.1%
I have my own experience,but I will follow the useful recommend. 1
0.1%
I have my own idea. 2
0.3%
I have my own method 14
1.8%
I have my own method and experience. 2
0.3%
I have my own method. 2
0.3%
I have my own technolagy. 2
0.3%
I know how to do 2
0.3%
I know very well in my heart. 2
0.3%
I only use the seeds and fertilizers,and part of the pesticides. 2
0.3%
I use it as it is recommended. 2
0.3%
I will combine it with my own experience. 4
0.5%
I will follow if the effect is good 6
0.8%
I will follow if the effect is good and yield is high 3
0.4%
I will grow it in the original method. 2
0.3%
I will use more dosage of pesticide than the protocol because I don't know the degree of pests and diseases 2
0.3%
I would looked at the situation 2
0.3%
Increase production and effection. 3
0.4%
Increase production. 4
0.5%
Increased production and income. 2
0.3%
It can be reference 2
0.3%
It can increase production and income. 2
0.3%
It can increase production and reduce the occur of pests and diseases. 2
0.3%
It can increase the production 2
0.3%
It didn't work 2
0.3%
It help us increase production. 2
0.3%
It is free to surport the technique guideness. 1
0.1%
It is not necessary. 2
0.3%
It is scientific 2
0.3%
It is useful because it is recommended by the consultant. 2
0.3%
It made the soil more healthy, and it helped me have a good harvest. 1
0.1%
It seems reasonable 2
0.3%
It should be done like this if grown this brand. 1
0.1%
It suggested me to change alternate husbandry, but I didn't for there was too busy. 2
0.3%
It tells application time and dosage 2
0.3%
It was technical 4
0.5%
It writed the wrong dosage 2
0.3%
It's good for high yield 2
0.3%
It's hard to say 2
0.3%
It's not bad 2
0.3%
It's partly useful 2
0.3%
It's pratical 2
0.3%
It's right method. 2
0.3%
It's too drought to grow corn well. 1
0.1%
It's very well 2
0.3%
Make sense 2
0.3%
NA 8
1%
Needn't spend money to participate in the compaign. 1
0.1%
No answer 49
6.4%
No need 7
0.9%
No need to use it? and I have done it myself for such a long time, and have kown how to grow. 2
0.3%
None 3
0.4%
Not necessary. 2
0.3%
Output was assured 2
0.3%
Part of it was useful. 1
0.1%
Possiblely high output. 1
0.1%
Proposal 2
0.3%
Rather good,scientific 1
0.1%
Reasonable arrangement, scientific 1
0.1%
Reasonable planting density is beneficial to crop growth and yield 2
0.3%
Rely on my own experience partly 4
0.5%
Save effort and increase production. 2
0.3%
Scientific farming 2
0.3%
Scientific farming can reduce diseases and pests, and it also can increase the utilization of soil. 1
0.1%
Scientific method of growing 2
0.3%
Some part should follow practical situation 2
0.3%
Some suggestions are not suit for practical situation 2
0.3%
Some suggestions are unreasonable,the cost is too high 2
0.3%
Something in protocol seems very reasonable, so I followes 1
0.1%
Sometimes I feel own experience is better 2
0.3%
Sometimes it is hard to follow the crop program. 2
0.3%
Sometimes it was not accurate. 1
0.1%
Sometimes, it was difficult to arrange in time, so I can’t follow it completely. 2
0.3%
Sometimes, it was difficult to arrange in time, so I didn’t follow it. 2
0.3%
Thanks to this protocol, the quality and quantity of output from my field advanced. 2
0.3%
The advise is very scientific and good 2
0.3%
The agricultural technique of agricultrual consultant is good. 2
0.3%
The agriculture consultant has the scientific evidance. 18
2.4%
The cost is high 2
0.3%
The cost is too high, so I followed my own experience sometimes. 2
0.3%
The cost is too high. 2
0.3%
The cost of pesticide is too high 2
0.3%
The experts have much experience. 1
0.1%
The experts have much experiences. 1
0.1%
The gorverment has arranged, and I just do it. 1
0.1%
The investment of the complete program is too high, I can't afford, my fields are scattered. 2
0.3%
The materials are too detail to practical operation. 2
0.3%
The national policy is like this, and afer I tried it, it is very good, so I just do it like this. 2
0.3%
The pesticide price is too expensive 2
0.3%
The pests and diseases are controlled well. 1
0.1%
The protocol is good for plant growth and harvest 2
0.3%
The protocol recommended by the consultant is useful. 8
1%
The recommended method should be good. 2
0.3%
The recommended protocal is good. 2
0.3%
The solution is suitable for farmers. If farmers can grow in strict accordance with the plan, they can achieve the effect of increasing production 2
0.3%
The suggestion is good. 2
0.3%
The yield can be high 2
0.3%
The yield can be high,so I followed 2
0.3%
The yield is high 2
0.3%
The yield is high and the pests and disease reduced 2
0.3%
The yield must be ensured 4
0.5%
There are experienced experts guiding, so we have confidence. 1
0.1%
There is no need to consult since we have been seeding for so long. 4
0.5%
There is no this protocol. 46
6%
There was drought and the price of corn was low this year. 2
0.3%
There was drought this year, the crops grew bad. 2
0.3%
They know technology and are trustworthy. 2
0.3%
This brand was not grown before, so my experience is less. 1
0.1%
This brand was not grown before. 2
0.3%
This is the guidance that the technicians have specifically made, and it is indeed time to apply pesticides. 1
0.1%
This method was not bad 2
0.3%
This program was great, my crops grew much better followed the protocol. 2
0.3%
Too complicated,I personally think it's not necessary to follow all steps. 4
0.5%
Uncertain 2
0.3%
Use seed from syngenta, I should plant it follow the protocol. 1
0.1%
Useful,can increase the yield. 1
0.1%
Very useful. 1
0.1%
We always follow our own way to grow, and we always do it in this way. 4
0.5%
We always follow this protocol. 4
0.5%
We always grow in this way, and we don't need any other protocol. 4
0.5%
We always grow in this way. 2
0.3%
We do like this all the time 2
0.3%
We don't know how to do with the given seed without paving geomembrane. 2
0.3%
We don't need it 2
0.3%
We don't need it, as we have grown the crops for such as long time and we know how to grow. 4
0.5%
We don't need it,we know how to do since we grow it for a long time 2
0.3%
We follow this after the test come to good, as well as it's national policy. 1
0.1%
We have been following our own methods,just like this. 2
0.3%
We have grown crop like this way every year, but we followed the planting density from protocol this year, it reduced the risk of yield.declined. 2
0.3%
We have grown in this way for a long time, and there's no need to ask this question. 14
1.8%
We have grown the crops for such a long time, and we know know to grow. 2
0.3%
We still use the old way to grow the crops. 2
0.3%
We use the old way to fram 2
0.3%
What the consultant advised is useful. 4
0.5%
according to local conditions 2
0.3%
according to my condition. 2
0.3%
according to my own experience 2
0.3%
according to my own experience and the weather. 2
0.3%
according to my previous experience 2
0.3%
according to protocol and the real situation,mostly followed 2
0.3%
adjust measures to local conditions 2
0.3%
advise that add own idea,it would be better 2
0.3%
being a farmer allows me a lot of spare time. 2
0.3%
believe science,have a try 2
0.3%
case by case 6
0.8%
combine this year's wheather 2
0.3%
comprehensive consideration 2
0.3%
consider every aspect and the possibility of plans to implement 2
0.3%
consider the cost 4
0.5%
consider this year's wheather 2
0.3%
consideration of cost and field condition 38
5%
cost is high 2
0.3%
depends on the weather 2
0.3%
effective 1
0.1%
farming scientifically 2
0.3%
field management,select good seed variety 1
0.1%
follow the method and experience 1
0.1%
follow the protocol make me confident of success 2
0.3%
good 2
0.3%
good advice should be accept 2
0.3%
good advice should be followed 4
0.5%
good for myself 2
0.3%
good suggestions 2
0.3%
i would follow the reasonable suggestions. 2
0.3%
improve the yield against the drought. 2
0.3%
improve yield 4
0.5%
it used well before, I don't want to give up 2
0.3%
it's alright. 2
0.3%
it's useful 2
0.3%
maximize profit 2
0.3%
membranae tectoria and potassic fertilizer 2
0.3%
none 5
0.7%
not all reasonable 2
0.3%
not good 2
0.3%
not practical 2
0.3%
only follow it the yield can be high 2
0.3%
only the weather is fit that I can follow 2
0.3%
particular analysis combined with the actual case 8
1%
reasonable advice 2
0.3%
refer to the label dosage,depends on the weather 1
0.1%
refer to the label dosage,depends on the weather . 1
0.1%
roughly the same. 2
0.3%
scientific management 2
0.3%
see the effect is good or not 1
0.1%
take precautions against pests and diseases 1
0.1%
the alarm of precautions against pests and diseases is timely 1
0.1%
the approach it suggested is effective and scientific 1
0.1%
the cost and the wheather should be take into consideration 2
0.3%
the cost is high. 2
0.3%
the cost should be take into consideration 4
0.5%
the suggestions are professional and reasonable. 2
0.3%
the timing of CP products application,application times 1
0.1%
to see if the effect is good or not, if good, I will follow 1
0.1%
too expensive, cost too much 2
0.3%
useful 2
0.3%
useful suggestions 2
0.3%
very good,rather scientific 1
0.1%
want to improve quality and yield, so just have a try 4
0.5%
we need to farm scientifically 2
0.3%
we needn't ask because wo have grown for such long time. 2
0.3%
weed pressure level is low. 1
0.1%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog