Good Growth Plan, 2014-2019
Hungary, 2014 - 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
HUN_2014-2019_GGP-P_v01_EN_M_A_OCS
Producer(s)
Syngenta
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Feb 16, 2021
Last modified
Feb 16, 2021
Page views
6564
Downloads
391
Q399. Please explain why you follow or do not follow the crop program and/or recommendations. (q399)
Data file: global_farm_data_country_HUN
Overview
Valid:
284
Type:
Discrete
Width:
193
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied protocol - appropriate agricultural engineering | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| As a trial | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| As much professional knowledge as possible. In order to achieve a higher yield. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Based on the specification of the seed manufacturer (by the contract) | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because I did not know this variety | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because I found it appropriate. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because I think it's good professionally. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because I think it's professional. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because I think it's useful | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because I think it's well based | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because I trust in the experience of the producer. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because I trust in the knowledge and experience of experts | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because I've found it reasonable. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because it is a well-tried method. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because it is based on practical knowledge and experience. I have been included in the elaboration. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because it was a good idea to highlight the sensitivity of the variety. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because it's good | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because of good quality. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Because of our special circumstances | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because of the supply of nutrients | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Because of useful advices | 4 |
1.4%
|
|
| Because there exist active ingredients which are cheaper | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Better technology, cost effectiveness, more profit. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Certain parts of crop protection technology | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Crop safety. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| DK/NA | 18 |
6.3%
|
|
| Don't know / no answer | 8 |
2.8%
|
|
| Due to the sandy soil I sow a lower number of plant per HA. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Experts are advising. The professional information is needed for production. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Financial responsibility. Technical features. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| For a good average yield. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| For a higher yield. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| For achieving better farming and better yield. Cost effectiveness. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I accept the experience of the producer. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I adjusted it to the local characteristics | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I also decide on the basis of my own experience | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I always adapt the technology to the characteristics of the field | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I applied my own technology | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I bought the recommended seed | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I chose the recommended hybrid | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I chose the recommended products | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I combined my own experience with the production technology. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I consider it but it's never detailed enough | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I consider the recommendations of the advisor | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I considered it good | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I did not need it. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I do this way because it was suggested. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I don't really follow it, because I have my own technology. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I follow it only partially. The lack of the material resource. Own ideas. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I followed it because I also had modifications in professional counselling since the environmental factors desired it that way | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I followed it in the seed selection. I trust the companies experience. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I followed it regarding the circumstances of sowing. I rarely followed it regarding the control of fungi and when improving the ripening. It is attractive in case of well-tried recommendations. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I followed my own experience | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I followed my own protocol and technology with good success. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I followed my own protocol based on my previous experiences. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I followed my own protocol because I found this good | 4 |
1.4%
|
|
| I followed my own protocol relying on my experience | 5 |
1.8%
|
|
| I followed my own protocol. | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I followed the protocol only partially because I also considered the local characteristics of my lands, the overall state of the crop and the extent of pest infection. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I followed the protocol only partially because I considered the local characteristics of the soil, the condition of the emerged crop, the rate of infection. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I followed the protocol only partly because I took into consideration the characteristics of the soil, the condition of the crop and the extent of the infection. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I follwed it because I trusted in them | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I found it appropriate | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I found it good | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I found it to be effective and it helped my work. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I found it to be good | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I found it useful | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I had no choice but to accept the seed treatment but I followed our own practice in plants/ha. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I have my own production experience | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I have the methods that have proven themselves, I know which products are good. High investment doesn't worth on weak soils | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I have the methods that have proven themselves, I know which products are good. If I followed the protocol off Syngenta or BASF no profit would be left. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I just partially followed the protocol because I took into account the local features of the soil, the state of the crop and the rate of infection. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I listen to the sales reps and sometimes we try new varieties. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I only followed the protocol partially because I take into consideration the characteristics of the soil, the condition of the crop and the extent of the infection. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I preferred my own experience and the one of my collegues. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I received good advices | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I rely on my own experience. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I sowed it earlier and it worked | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I tried to achieve better results with the help of the advisor | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I tried to follow it and apply it to the local circumstances because these protocols assume an optimal condition which is not everywhere present | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I trust his expertise | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trust in its expertise | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I trust in the advice of the experts. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trust in the advisor | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trust in the expertise of my professional advisor | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trust in the expertise of the advisor. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trust in the professional advisor | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trust its expertise. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I trusted the expertise | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I updated it based on the characteristics of the production year. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I used less fertilizer than recommended because of the price of the fertilizer and used my usual number of plants per hectare. | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I used less fertilizers to become more cost effective | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I used the same number of plants per hectare, nitrogen amount but I used different herbicide because of the weed flora | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| I was satisfied with the results | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| I'm sure experts did this plan, so I follow it. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I've been applying for several years and it's working. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| I've found it good based on the previous experience. | 4 |
1.4%
|
|
| I've found it useful | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| In case of Agrosolution because of the unknown effects. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| In order to achieve a better and higher average yield | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| In order to achieve a better yield | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| In order to achieve a high oil content | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| In order to achieve the guaranteed yields | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| In the first year I grew a hybrid wheat. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| It fit the technology, good production prices | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| It fit the technology. | 4 |
1.4%
|
|
| It is similar, except for the weed control. I do not use basic chemicals on the sandy soil and because of the incalculable precipitation. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It is supported from a professional aspect so I agree with the protocol | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| It promised good profitability. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It seemed a good possibility. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It seemed to be a good recommendation | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| It seemed to be relevant. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It was a forced situation | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It was a useful guide to the special characteristics of the variety | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It was usefult to prevent disesaes | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| It's a reliable source and the management is satisfied with the results | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| It's the result of a joint work, we elaborated it together. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Moddus (product for stem strengthening) was expensive. Stabilan instead of that. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| NA | 5 |
1.8%
|
|
| Nem tudja/ Nincs válasz | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| No answer | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| No reply | 4 |
1.4%
|
|
| Participation at demonstrations (variety demonstrations, technologies, new chemicals in trials), visible results | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| The farm has reached the expected yield | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| The local relations and the weather did not make it possible | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| The protocol given by the advisor was understandable and could be executed easily | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| The recommendation was for the winter season (seeds, weed control), we came up with our own plan for spring | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| The recommendations of seed breeders are important, they try to sell the most expensive seed but this isn't always the best choice in a semi-intensive technology. | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| The technology is detailed and good, but following the whole protocol is expensive . | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| The technology was the same with the own protocol | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| The weather changed my plan | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| There were certain products that we chose from the recommendation based on our experience from previous years. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| There were useful suggestions in the technology offer, that hadn't been familiar for me before, I wanted to try it. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Trust | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| UA. mint A | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Useful information, description of the variety | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Useful, good experience. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Useful, practice oriented ideas. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We could achieve the expected results | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We decided to choose different products | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We follow them because of information which are more up-to-date from a professional aspect | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| We get many offers and we select from these offers what is suitable for our fields. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We have accepted the hybrid offer and it was an excellent hybrid | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We have not yet met such a problem | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We tried to follow it, because we produce Syngenta variety. Finally we didn't follow because certain elements of the technology were too expensive. | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| We've followed dosage because it ensures yield safety | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Weather | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| Weather change. | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| Weather differences | 3 |
1.1%
|
|
| Weather, peak of the work | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| acceptable yield | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| as a guidance | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| because I've adapted the advice to the local characteristics | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| because of a secure yield | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| because of successful growing | 2 |
0.7%
|
|
| because of the better yield | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| because of the owner of the seeds recommended it | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| different variety, weed control | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| fertilization, selection of the variety and crop protection | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| only the OSR hybrid was defined, I saw that hybrid, that's all that happened | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| own experience | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| recommended variety, plant density, recommended weed control | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
| we followed instructions on the nutrient supply | 1 |
0.4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.