Good Growth Plan, 2014-2019
Japan, 2014 - 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
JPN_2014-2019_GGP-P_v01_EN_M_A_OCS
Producer(s)
Syngenta
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Feb 16, 2021
Last modified
Feb 16, 2021
Page views
7453
Downloads
392
Q399. E1. What is your opinion about the in-furrow technology you applied? (q399e1)
Data file: global_farm_data_country_JPN
Overview
Valid:
164
Type:
Discrete
Width:
246
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 |
2.4%
|
|
| ? Using the fertilization management information JA faxes us as a reference | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Can't talk about the effect of the in-furrow method because it's not something that produces results right away, but it sure made my communication with the Syngenta rep frequent | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Consulted the control calendar for rotation method. It was good because it was similar to my way of thinking. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| DK | 29 |
17.7%
|
|
| Do see its effect on Thanatephorus cucumeris. Very helpful. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Don't know. Don't know if it will be helpful. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Easy to use with timely provision of information | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Expect that In-furrow will spread as much as they have overseas because we are seeing new pests and diseases. Hope it will become available for products other than Amistar. Hoping for good effect on the next crop, too. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Good that it provides information before disease infestations and helps prevent damages | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Graphs would be easier to understand | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Hope the Syngenta product (Actara) for solanum flea beetle can be applied at the same time using In-furrow | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| I can see that the in-furrow method has improved potato quality, but I haven't seen a yield increase yet | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| I didn't do in-furrow because I'd returned the machine to Syngenta. Next year, I'm planning to buy Amigo and start in-furrow again. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| I don't expect its effect to show up in 2-3 years. I'm planning to continue using it until the effect is seen in all the crops we grow in rotation (potatoes, beets, and barley/wheat/oat). | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| I like that this is part of a global study by Syngenta. Would be even better if the questionnaire was adjusted more to the situations in Japan. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| I think things went pretty much perfectly as this was my fourth year. Both the yield and the quality were good. Others in this area were also successful, but I had even better results. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| I'm satisfied that we see less Thanatephorus cucumeris now after years of struggle. My potatoes have smoother skin now. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Impossible to put 100% of the instructions into practice. We grow many kinds of crops and the weather intervenes, too. We don't have enough labor. The combinations of fertilizers and control products that can be used together are too complicated. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| My field grows starch potatoes, so it's not very meaningful to compare it to the overall data that includes both fresh market and processing potatoes | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| None | 11 |
6.7%
|
|
| Nothing | 41 |
25%
|
|
| Potatoes have smoother surface now. The fields we used the in-furrow method had relatively high yields. Its effect is more prominent in years when the overall potato yield was poor. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Promising. Wish they do the same for products other than Amistar. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Same as usual. There was no Thanatephorus cucumeris or Rhizoctonia, and little damage from low temperatures. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Suspect that whoever put together this questionnaire don't know anything. I don't understand the intention of these questions. And they ask similar questions over and over. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| The Syngenta rep pays us visits very frequently and we've established a friendly relationship | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| The information on new agents is helpful | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| The technology is great. It just needs more chemical products that can be used. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| The variety I'm growing is no longer fit for the soil or the climate, and I don't think in-furrow alone can solve these overarching problems | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Use it to confirm what I'm doing is right, and I need it to make sure not to make mistakes with agents | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Using it only as a reference because there are margins of errors for different areas | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Want them to address individual farmers instead of providing general opinions | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| Want to use it again next year because its instructions on the year's new agents against diseases are effective | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| We couldn't use the in-furrow method this year because the machine was broken, but it's fixed now so we'll be able to use it next year. We've used it for a few years now, but I haven't seen a clear effect yet. | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| We've been successful in controlling Thanatephorus cucumeris, so I have high hopes for the in-furrow method | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| When to control | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| nothing | 13 |
7.9%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.