Smallholder Commercial Agriculture Project, IFAD Impact Assessment Surveys, 2019
Sao Tome and Principe, 2018
Get Microdata
Reference ID
STP_2019_PAPAC-IIAS_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Producer(s)
International Fund for Agricultural Development, Director of the Instituto Nacional de Estatística
Collections
Metadata
Created on
May 16, 2022
Last modified
Jul 01, 2022
Page views
29962
Downloads
592
- Data files
- anon_analysis
- anon_hhroster
I.4. Name of the Producer Association (PA) (comm_i_4)
Data file: anon_analysis
Overview
Valid:
722
Invalid:
618
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
2
Width:
6
Range:
101 - 191
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Agua Sampaio (CECAB) | 36 |
5%
|
| 102 | Agua Telha | 5 |
0.7%
|
| 103 | Benfica (CECAB) | 6 |
0.8%
|
| 104 | Cad�o | 0 |
0%
|
| 105 | Caldeira | 17 |
2.4%
|
| 106 | Costa Santos | 2 |
0.3%
|
| 107 | Filipinas | 0 |
0%
|
| 108 | Generosa | 22 |
3%
|
| 109 | Jos� Luis | 0 |
0%
|
| 110 | Laranjeira | 2 |
0.3%
|
| 111 | Lemb�/Ponta Furada | 0 |
0%
|
| 112 | Maian�o | 8 |
1.1%
|
| 113 | Maria Luisa | 9 |
1.2%
|
| 114 | Monte Forte | 7 |
1%
|
| 115 | Monte Macaco | 0 |
0%
|
| 116 | Mulundo | 11 |
1.5%
|
| 117 | Paga Fogo | 0 |
0%
|
| 118 | Pedra Maria | 0 |
0%
|
| 119 | Plancas I | 15 |
2.1%
|
| 120 | Plancas II | 14 |
1.9%
|
| 121 | Ponta Figo | 15 |
2.1%
|
| 122 | Prado | 5 |
0.7%
|
| 123 | Praia das Conchas | 16 |
2.2%
|
| 124 | Queluz | 12 |
1.7%
|
| 125 | R. P. Sede | 0 |
0%
|
| 126 | Rib. Funda | 11 |
1.5%
|
| 127 | Ribeira Palma Praia | 12 |
1.7%
|
| 128 | Rio Ouro Pequeno | 11 |
1.5%
|
| 129 | Rosema | 7 |
1%
|
| 130 | Saltado | 0 |
0%
|
| 131 | Santa Jeny | 15 |
2.1%
|
| 132 | Santa Luzia (CECAB) | 26 |
3.6%
|
| 133 | Santa Teresa | 0 |
0%
|
| 134 | Sede S. Cat. | 0 |
0%
|
| 135 | Sta Clotilde | 0 |
0%
|
| 136 | S�o Jos� (CECAB) | 0 |
0%
|
| 137 | Vila Braga | 0 |
0%
|
| 138 | Vista - Alegre | 12 |
1.7%
|
| 139 | Bem Posta | 16 |
2.2%
|
| 140 | Colonia A�oriana | 0 |
0%
|
| 141 | Mongo | 0 |
0%
|
| 142 | Novo Destino | 19 |
2.6%
|
| 143 | Poiso Alto | 7 |
1%
|
| 144 | Santa Catarina (CECAFEB) | 0 |
0%
|
| 145 | S�o Jos� e S�o Carlos (CECAFEB) | 3 |
0.4%
|
| 146 | S�o Nicolau | 0 |
0%
|
| 147 | Abade | 0 |
0%
|
| 148 | Alto Douro | 11 |
1.5%
|
| 149 | Anselmo Andrade | 7 |
1%
|
| 150 | Bernado Faro | 17 |
2.4%
|
| 151 | Castelo | 15 |
2.1%
|
| 152 | Clara Dias | 3 |
0.4%
|
| 153 | Claudino Faro | 22 |
3%
|
| 154 | Guegue | 13 |
1.8%
|
| 155 | Mato Cana | 25 |
3.5%
|
| 156 | Mendes da Silva | 11 |
1.5%
|
| 157 | Mestre Ant�nio | 7 |
1%
|
| 158 | Monte Belo (CECAQ11) | 6 |
0.8%
|
| 159 | Pedroma | 10 |
1.4%
|
| 160 | Ponta das Palmeiras (CECAQ11) | 2 |
0.3%
|
| 161 | Quimpo | 13 |
1.8%
|
| 162 | Santa Clotilde | 4 |
0.6%
|
| 163 | Santo Ant�nio | 14 |
1.9%
|
| 164 | S�o Janu�rio | 7 |
1%
|
| 165 | Uba Budo Sede | 32 |
4.4%
|
| 166 | Vila Celeste | 3 |
0.4%
|
| 167 | �gua Iz� | 63 |
8.7%
|
| 168 | Agua Francisca/Plateau/Sta Adelaide/Monte Estoril/Monta Alegre/Sta Adelaide/Laura | 15 |
2.1%
|
| 169 | Agua Sampaio (CEPIBA) | 30 |
4.2%
|
| 170 | Bela Vista/Porto Real | 2 |
0.3%
|
| 171 | Benfica (CEPIBA) | 0 |
0%
|
| 172 | Monte Belo (CEPIBA) | 0 |
0%
|
| 173 | Monte Belo / Mendes da Silva (CEPIBA) | 0 |
0%
|
| 174 | Nova Estrela/Abade | 0 |
0%
|
| 175 | Ponta das Palmeiras/Abade (CEPIBA) | 2 |
0.3%
|
| 176 | Praia Nazar� | 0 |
0%
|
| 177 | Rio Lima/Q. Palmeiras | 0 |
0%
|
| 178 | S.Jos�/V.Alegre/Ot�t�/ Diana | 0 |
0%
|
| 179 | Santa Catarina (CEPIBA) | 0 |
0%
|
| 180 | Santa Clara | 26 |
3.6%
|
| 181 | Santa Luzia (CEPIBA) | 0 |
0%
|
| 182 | Santa Rita/Azeitona/Ponta do Sol | 5 |
0.7%
|
| 183 | Santo Antonio/Quimpo2 | 0 |
0%
|
| 184 | Sao Joaquim/P/M | 0 |
0%
|
| 185 | Sao Jos�/Vista Alegre | 0 |
0%
|
| 186 | Sto.Ant�nio/Quimpo II | 0 |
0%
|
| 187 | Terreiro Velho | 16 |
2.2%
|
| 188 | Uba Budo/Pedroma/Pinheira/Clara Dias | 0 |
0%
|
| 189 | Vanguarda/Rodia | 0 |
0%
|
| 190 | Vila Fernanda | 0 |
0%
|
| 191 | Vila Fernanda/R. Vouga | 0 |
0%
|
| 1001 | .A | 12 | |
| Sysmiss | 606 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.