Rwanda Seasonal Agriculture Survey 2017
Rwanda, 2016 - 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
RWA_2017_RSAS_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Producer(s)
National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Jul 10, 2019
Last modified
Jul 10, 2019
Page views
94628
Downloads
1420
- Data files
- SeasonA_2017_LSF_Antierosion
-
SeasonA_2017_LSF_Crop
production - SeasonA_2017_LSF_Fertilizers
- SeasonA_2017_LSF_Irrigation_Soil_preparation_and_Land_tenure
- SeasonA_2017_LSF_Pesticides
- SeasonA_2017_LSF_Screening
- SeasonA_2017_SSF_Antierosion
-
SeasonA_2017_SSF_Crop
production - SeasonA_2017_SSF_Fertilizers
- SeasonA_2017_SSF_Irrigation_Soil_preparation_and_Land_tenure
- SeasonA_2017_SSF_Pesticides
- SeasonA_2017_SSF_Screening
- SeasonB_2017_LSF_Antierosion
-
SeasonB_2017_LSF_Crop
production - SeasonB_2017_LSF_Fertilizers
- SeasonB_2017_LSF_Irrigation_Soil_preparation_and_Land_tenure
- SeasonB_2017_LSF_Pesticides
- SeasonB_2017_LSF_Screening
- SeasonB_2017_SSF_Antierosion
-
SeasonB_2017_SSF_Crop
production - SeasonB_2017_SSF_Fertilizers
- SeasonB_2017_SSF_Irrigation_Soil_preparation_and_Land_tenure
- SeasonB_2017_SSF_Pesticides
- SeasonB_2017_SSF_Screening
- SeasonC_2017_SSF_Antierosion
-
SeasonC_2017_SSF_Crop
production - SeasonC_2017_SSF_Fertilizers
- SeasonC_2017_SSF_Irrigation_Soil_preparation_and_Land_tenure
- SeasonC_2017_SSF_Pesticides
- SeasonC_2017_SSF_Screening
2.12.2 Crop proportion in (range) (s2q12_2)
Data file: SeasonC_2017_SSF_Screening
Overview
Valid:
4200
Invalid:
3653
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
57
End:
58
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 10
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <=10% | 2 |
0%
|
| 2 | 11-20% | 347 |
8.3%
|
| 3 | 21-30% | 201 |
4.8%
|
| 4 | 31-40% | 225 |
5.4%
|
| 5 | 41-50% | 197 |
4.7%
|
| 6 | 51-60% | 155 |
3.7%
|
| 7 | 61-70% | 102 |
2.4%
|
| 8 | 71-80% | 99 |
2.4%
|
| 9 | 81-90% | 92 |
2.2%
|
| 10 | 91-100% | 2780 |
66.2%
|
| Sysmiss | 3653 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.