Private Farmer Livestock-Poultry 2006
Nigeria, 2007
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA_2006_PFLP_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Producer(s)
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Jul 17, 2019
Last modified
Jul 17, 2019
Page views
53072
Downloads
210
- Data files
-
Household ID
and ICT -
Types of
Livestock -
Input
utilization -
Sources of
Livestock Input - Employment
-
Changes in
stock -
Sales of
Livestock
Products -
Sources of
funds - Dairy products
-
Marketing
problems -
Processing
facilities -
Storage
Facilities - Market channel
- Compare Season
-
Outlook for
next season -
Problems in
Purchasing -
Production
problems - storage problem
- Suggestions
-
Government
Assistance
State (State)
Data file: Input utilization
Overview
Valid:
3907
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
1
End:
2
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 37
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
State
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abia | 9 |
0.2%
|
| 2 | Adamawa | 66 |
1.7%
|
| 3 | Akwa-ibom | 16 |
0.4%
|
| 4 | Anambra | 89 |
2.3%
|
| 5 | Bauchi | 34 |
0.9%
|
| 6 | Bayelsa | 0 |
0%
|
| 7 | Benue | 41 |
1%
|
| 8 | Borno | 26 |
0.7%
|
| 9 | Cross river | 29 |
0.7%
|
| 10 | Delta | 0 |
0%
|
| 11 | Ebonyi | 111 |
2.8%
|
| 12 | Edo | 24 |
0.6%
|
| 13 | Ekiti | 0 |
0%
|
| 14 | Enugu | 109 |
2.8%
|
| 15 | Gombe | 0 |
0%
|
| 16 | Imo | 16 |
0.4%
|
| 17 | Jigawa | 441 |
11.3%
|
| 18 | Kaduna | 225 |
5.8%
|
| 19 | Kano | 254 |
6.5%
|
| 20 | Katsina | 320 |
8.2%
|
| 21 | Kebbi | 429 |
11%
|
| 22 | Kogi | 121 |
3.1%
|
| 23 | Kwara | 174 |
4.5%
|
| 24 | Lagos | 2 |
0.1%
|
| 25 | Nasarawa | 255 |
6.5%
|
| 26 | Niger | 168 |
4.3%
|
| 27 | Ogun | 11 |
0.3%
|
| 28 | Ondo | 26 |
0.7%
|
| 29 | Osun | 34 |
0.9%
|
| 30 | Oyo | 146 |
3.7%
|
| 31 | Plateau | 65 |
1.7%
|
| 32 | Rivers | 71 |
1.8%
|
| 33 | Sokoto | 419 |
10.7%
|
| 34 | Taraba | 43 |
1.1%
|
| 35 | Yobe | 87 |
2.2%
|
| 36 | Zamfara | 42 |
1.1%
|
| 37 | Fct abuja | 4 |
0.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.