Land Husbandry, Water Harvesting and Hillside Irrigation Project Impact Evaluation 2016, Fourth Follow-up Survey

Rwanda, 2016

Get Microdata

Reference ID

RWA_2016_LWH-W4_v01_EN_M_V01_A_OCS

Producer(s)

Florence Kondylis, Maria Jones, Saahil Karpe

Collections

Agricultural Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Sep 16, 2020

Last modified

Nov 08, 2022

Page views

566591

Downloads

2153

Why was the agricultural decision maker not the main respondent? (bc_not_decisionmaker)

Data file: lwh_followup4

Overview

Valid: 8

Invalid: 997

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 20712

End: 20712

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 4

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	Person was gone from the HH for more than 3 days	3	37.5%
2	Person was gone from the HH for 1-2 days	0	0%
3	Do not know, he was available	0	0%
4	Other reason	5	62.5%
Sysmiss		997

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Others

Notes

Why was the agricultural decision maker not the main respondent?

Back to Catalog