NRU_2005_SES-PROCFISH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Socio-Economic survey PROCFish/C, 2005
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Nauru | NRU |
Socio-Economic/Monitoring Survey [hh/sems]
In late 2003—early 2004, the Pacific Community (SPC) conducted a survey of a number of Pacific regional fisheries authorities to determine their views on the information that should be collected in socioeconomic surveys to support reef fisheries management. In 2005, PROCFish/C project conducted fieldwork in Nauru.
The coastal component of the Pacific Regional Oceanic and Coastal Fisheries Development Programme (PROCFish/C) and the (Pacific Regional) Coastal Fisheries Development Programme (CoFish) conducted fieldwork around Nauru in October and November 2005. Given the size of Nauru, it was treated as a single site, with large areas surveyed and a country profile developed. Survey work in Nauru covered three disciplines (finfish, invertebrate and socioeconomic), with the work undertaken by a team of five programme scientists and several local attachments from the fisheries department. The fieldwork included capacity building for the local counterparts through instruction on survey methodologies in all three disciplines, including the collection of data, and inputting the data into the programme's database.
The aim of the survey work is to provide baseline information on the status of reef fisheries, and to help fill the massive information gap that hinders the effective management of reef fisheries. Nauru is one of 17 countries and territories being surveyed over a five to six year period by the PROCFish/C and CoFish programme. Other outputs from the overall work of the programme include the implementing of the first comprehensive multi-country comparative assessment of reef fisheries (including resource and human components) ever undertaken in the Pacific Islands region using identical methodologies at each site; the dissemination of results in country reports that comprise a set of “reef fisheries profiles” for the sites in each country, in order to provide information for coastal fisheries development and management planning; the development of a set of indicators (or fishery status reference points) to provide guidance when developing local and national reef fishery management plans and monitoring programmes; and the development of data and information management systems, including regional and national databases.
Sample survey data [ssd]
Households
The scope of the study was:
(a) HOUSEHOLD:
Household size and composition
Ranked sources of income and average household expenditure level
Average household consumption patterns and sources
Average number of fishers and boats per household
(b) INDIVIDUAL:
Education level of adult members of the household
When, how often and during which months of the year fishers go out to particular habitats
Average catch size
Catch composition
Fishing techniques
Proportion of the catch targeted for subsistence, gift and sale, and preservation
How finfish and invertebrates are preserved
Community's fishing grounds
Management rules
Major problems relating to the use/management of the community's marine resources
Quantities by species or groups marketed
Quality and processing level of species marketed;
Price in local currency/USD
Client groups
Quantitative and qualitative changes in marketing perceived over a period of time
Topic | Vocabulary |
---|---|
Agriculture & Rural Development | FAO |
Food (production, crisis) | FAO |
Access to Finance | FAO |
Prices statistics | FAO |
Trade | FAO |
National coverage
The survey covered de jure household members. All household members responding the "Finfishers" and "Invertebrate fishers" questionnaires must be aged 15 years and over and must be living in the household surveyed.
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Coastal Fisheries Programme | Pacific Community (SPC) |
Name | Role |
---|---|
Reef Fisheries Observatory | Technical assistance |
Name | Role |
---|---|
European Commission | Funding |
At each site the extent of the community to be covered by the socioeconomic survey is determined by the size, nature and use of the fishing grounds. This selection process is highly dependent on local marine tenure rights. For example, in the case of community-owned fishing rights, a fishing community includes all villages that have access to a particular fishing ground. If the fisheries of all the villages concerned are comparable, one or two villages may be selected as representative samples, and consequently surveyed. Results will then be extrapolated to include all villages accessing the same fishing grounds under the same marine tenure system.
Most of the households included in the survey are chosen by simple random selection, as are the finfish and invertebrate fishers associated with any of these households. In addition, important participants in one or several particular fisheries may be selected for complementary surveying. Random sampling is used to provide an average and representative picture of the fishery situation in each community, including those who do not fish, those engaged in finfish and/or invertebrate fishing for subsistence, and those engaged in fishing activities on a small-scale artisanal basis. This assumption applies provided that selected communities are mostly traditional, relatively small (~100-300 households) and (from a socioeconomic point of view) largely homogenous. Similarly, gender and participation patterns (types of fishers by gender and fishery) revealed through the surveys are assumed to be representative of the entire community. Accordingly, harvest figures reported by male and female fishers participating in a community's various fisheries may be extrapolated to assess the impacts resulting from the entire community, sample size permitting (at least 25-30% of all households).
Start | End | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2005-10-01 | 2005-11-30 | Data collection |
(a) CLEANING OPERATIONS
A software programme (SEMCoS) has been developed in tandem with this manual to assist in automatically performing all necessary analysis and producing outputs for the data collected.
(b) OTHER PROCESSING
Data from all questionnaire forms are entered in the Reef Fisheries Integrated Database (RFID) system. All data entered are first verified and 'cleaned' prior to analysis. In the process of data entry, a comprehensive list of vernacular and corresponding scientific names for finfish and invertebrate species is developed. Database queries have been defined and established that allow automatic retrieval of the descriptive statistics used when summarising results at the site and national levels.
Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? | Confidentiality declaration text |
---|---|
yes | The Pacific Data Hub - Microdata Library, is responsible for improving the accessibility and availability of datasets and promoting new ways of using and reusing data for current and future use. These datasets have been modified in such a way that the possibility of identifying individuals or households is minimised. They are made available to individual researchers, universities and research institutions subject to a number of conditions known as Terms of Use. (See https://microdata.pacificdata.org/index.php/terms-of-use). |
Public-use file, accessible to all.
"Pacific Community's Coastal Fisheries Programme, Nauru PROCFish/C - Socio-Economic survey 2005 (SE-PROCFISH 2005), Version 01 of the public-use dataset (2005), provided by the Microdata Library. https://microdata.pacificdata.org/index.php/home"
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses
Name | Affiliation | URL |
---|---|---|
Coastal Fisheries Programme | Pacific Community (SPC) | https://coastfish.spc.int/ |
DDI_NRU_2005_SES-PROCFISH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_FAO
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Office of Chief Statistician | Food and Agriculture Organization | Adoption of metadata for FAM |
Statistics for Development Division | Pacific Community | Documentation of the study |
NRU_2005_SES-PROCFISH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_v01