Agricultural Household Survey 2017
Rwanda, 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
RWA_2017_AHS_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Producer(s)
National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Mar 02, 2021
Last modified
Mar 02, 2021
Page views
25823
Downloads
199
- Data files
-
S0_General
Information -
S1_Household
members
characteristics -
S2_Land tenure
crops planted -
S3_Extension
services and
agricultural
programmes -
S4_Funding
during
2016_2017 -
S5_Agricultural
Inputs -
S6_Agricultural
Practices -
S7_1_Agricultural
small tools -
S7_2_Agricultural
durable tools -
S8_A_Production
Use, storage
and Expenses -
S8_B_Production
Use,Storage and
Expenses -
S9_Number of
animals -
S10_1_Cattle
milk production -
S10_2_Cattle
milk production
use -
S10_3_Honey
production -
S11_Animal
inputs and
services
0.2 District Name (s0q2)
Data file: S10_2_Cattle milk production use
Overview
Valid:
3989
Invalid:
0
Minimum:
11
Maximum:
57
Type:
Continuous
Decimal:
0
Width:
8
Range:
11 - 57
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Nyarugenge | 68 |
1.7%
|
| 12 | Gasabo | 138 |
3.5%
|
| 13 | Kicukiro | 64 |
1.6%
|
| 21 | Nyanza | 144 |
3.6%
|
| 22 | Gisagara | 75 |
1.9%
|
| 23 | Nyaruguru | 83 |
2.1%
|
| 24 | Huye | 176 |
4.4%
|
| 25 | Nyamagabe | 138 |
3.5%
|
| 26 | Ruhango | 120 |
3%
|
| 27 | Muhanga | 82 |
2.1%
|
| 28 | Kamonyi | 165 |
4.1%
|
| 31 | Karongi | 99 |
2.5%
|
| 32 | Rutsiro | 180 |
4.5%
|
| 33 | Rubavu | 152 |
3.8%
|
| 34 | Nyabihu | 188 |
4.7%
|
| 35 | Ngororero | 66 |
1.7%
|
| 36 | Rusizi | 93 |
2.3%
|
| 37 | Nyamasheke | 98 |
2.5%
|
| 41 | Rulindo | 72 |
1.8%
|
| 42 | Gakenke | 76 |
1.9%
|
| 43 | Musanze | 124 |
3.1%
|
| 44 | Burera | 94 |
2.4%
|
| 45 | Gicumbi | 285 |
7.1%
|
| 51 | Rwamagana | 158 |
4%
|
| 52 | Nyagatare | 235 |
5.9%
|
| 53 | Gatsibo | 240 |
6%
|
| 54 | Kayonza | 158 |
4%
|
| 55 | Kirehe | 131 |
3.3%
|
| 56 | Ngoma | 131 |
3.3%
|
| 57 | Bugesera | 156 |
3.9%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.