Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
- Consumers were not consulted as such fish processors do not use them as they claim that it cooks the fish instead of drying it. - The management of the structure was left in the hands of people who were not ready to take charge of it. - There was | 1 |
10%
|
|
- Main benefit is that SSF women are able to control loss of fish. However the challenge is that they are not modern methods of drying fish. | 1 |
10%
|
|
- Prevent loss and smart way of drying fish. - Maintains nutrition content of the fish. - However, it is expensive and requires regular replacement of plastic paper when it has been damaged by sun. | 1 |
10%
|
|
- Prevent loss and smart way of drying fish. - Prevent loss of nutrition content of the fish. - It is expensive and requires regular replacement of plastic paper when damaged by sun. - Mindset change by fisheries groups is difficult in using modern | 1 |
10%
|
|
- They are smart way of drying fish and works better even during rain season. - They are expensive to maintain - Lack of ownership | 1 |
10%
|
|
- They prevent loss of fish. However the challenge is that most of the facilities provided did not follow proper consultation with local communities and currently not being used. | 1 |
10%
|
|
- Locally available and easy to maintain. - Ownership is a challenge since most of these items are provided for a group. | 1 |
10%
|
|
- They reduce losses, - Promote quality products, - Protect ecosystem. However, they are expensive and require investment. | 1 |
10%
|
|
1. Benefits - The facilities are more efficient in drying small fish and producing quality fish products which have a long shelf life and fetches high prices on the market. - These facilities are critical in meeting the matching issues of harmonizin | 1 |
10%
|
|
Most of these practices are eco-friendly and considers climate change implications. However they are new, some are being piloted and tested with huge costs limitations for SSF | 1 |
10%
|