NGA_2023_NASS_v01_M_v01_A_ESS
National Agricultural Sample Survey 2023
Agricultural Household Survey
NASS 2023
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Nigeria | NGA |
Agricultural Survey [ag/oth]
The National Agriculture Sample Survey (NASS) 2023 is the second round of NASS surveys, previously conducted in 2010/2011. NASS 2023 was conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), in collaboration with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (FMAFS), and the World Bank. The survey covers all agricultural activities in the country at the household, establishment (corporate farm), and community levels, capturing information on crop production, fishery, forestry, livestock activities, and farmgate prices.
NASS is designed to provide accurate and up-to-date agricultural statistics that allow policymakers, researchers, and development partners to make informed decisions that directly impact the well-being of farmers, rural communities, and the broader economy. These statistics are essential for enhancing food security, improving productivity, and addressing regional disparities in agricultural performance. Additionally, robust agricultural data are vital in supporting Nigeria’s efforts to diversify its economy from oil dependency. By identifying key areas for investment, such as crop production, livestock management, and agro-processing, data can guide both public and private sector investments to boost agricultural output and expand exports. Moreover, the survey contributes to tracking progress toward national goals while supporting Nigeria's efforts to meet global commitments like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Hence, NASS provides useful data for understanding the state of the agricultural sector and offers essential production and structural data to support evidence-based planning and implementation of agricultural programs vital for addressing current economic challenges and enhancing the livelihood of many Nigerians.
This survey is also essential for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of existing agricultural programs and ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently. Capturing detailed data on agriculture practices, outputs, and challenges, the survey supports the planning and implementation of initiatives aimed at improving productivity, enhancing food security, and adapting to challenges like climate change and market fluctuations.
The objectives of the survey are to:
i. provide data on agricultural production in 2022/2023 and the structure of the sector as a whole to assist the government in policy formulation and programme planning;
ii. effectively and efficiently provide appropriate agricultural information to increase public awareness; and
iii. provide data that could be used to compute agricultural sector contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Sample survey data [ssd]
Households
The household survey component of National Agricultural Sample Survey (NASS) covered the following subject areas:
• General Household/Holding Identification
• Crop Farming
• Livestock/ Poultry farming
• Fisheries
• Forestry
• Apiary production (Beekeeping)
• Labour
| Topic | Vocabulary |
|---|---|
| Agricultural Production | World Bank |
The National Population Commission (NPC) provided the sampling frame of Enumeration Areas (EAs), newly demarcated for the proposed 2023 Housing and Population Census. This was used as the primary sampling frame. Although data were collected across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), only 767 out of the 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs) were covered due to security challenges. The affected states/LGAs are Borno state (Monguno, Kukawa and Abadam LGAs) and Orlu, Orsu, Oru East, and Njaba LGAs in Imo state. The number of EAs covered varied from state to state depending on the number of Agricultural EAs and LGAs.
The final sampling units used were agricultural households involved in crop/ livestock farming, and fishery households.
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (formerly Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development | Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) | Technical support |
| National Population Commision | Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) | Technical support |
| Name | Abbreviation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| The World Bank Group | WBG | Financial assistance |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Ministry of Finance | Federal Government of Nigeria | Supervision |
| Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | United Nations | Technical assistance |
| The 50x2030 Initiative | Technical assistance | |
| World Bank | Technical assistance |
The final sampling units used were agricultural households involved in crop/ livestock farming, and fishery households. The sampling method of NASS-household is a stratified three-phased sampling as follows:
Third-phase details:
i. First stage: Stratification of EAs into agricultural and non-agricultural EAs drawn from the 40 EAs listed in each LGA
ii. Second stage: Systematic sampling of ten farming households (crop/ livestock farming) and additional fishery-only households in fishery-intensive LGAs (18 in total) up to a maximum of 12 households per EA. This selection was stratified by sorting the listed farming households according to several agricultural characteristics, including type of farming activity, number of plots, livestock numbers (in tropical livestock units), and gender of household head.
Sample Size and Allocation
Nationally, a total of 15 591 EAs were selected across the 36 States of the Federation and FCT for the NASS household survey. The sample was distributed across LGAs based on the estimated total number of plots per LGA. Within each LGA, the sample was further allocated between urban and rural areas in proportion to the estimated agricultural population. In the selected EAs, 152 485 households were finally sampled.
The final probability of selection for each Enumeration Area (EA) is the product of its selection probabilities in the first and second sampling phases. The design weight was defined as the inverse of the final selection probability. These design weights were further adjusted for non-response and scaled to the updated frame population, providing the final weights used to produce estimates (means, totals, proportions, etc.) based on standard Horvitz-Thompson estimators.
It is important to note that the sampling weights were calibrated using preliminary household counts obtained from the cartographic work of the National Population Commission (NPC).
In the microdata, the variable “nasc_listing_weight” represents the household listing weight.
The NASS household questionnaire served as a meticulously designed instrument administered within selected households to gather comprehensive data.
The questionnaire was structured into the following sections:
0A. HOLDING IDENTIFICATION
0B. ROSTER OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS
0C. AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES
0D. AGRICULTURALACTIVITIES
2. PLOT ROSTER AND DETAILS
3. CROP ROSTER
1A: TEMPORARY (NON-VEGETABLE) CROP PRODUCTION
1H: TEMPORARY CROP PRODUCTION (VEGETABLE CROPS)
1B: TEMPORARY CROP DESTINATION
2A: PERMANENT CROP PRODUCTION
2B: PERMANENT CROP DESTINATION
4: SEED AND PLANT USE
3C: INPUT USE
2(DRY SEASON): PLOT ROSTER AND DETAILS
3(DRY SEASON): CROP ROSTER
1A(DRY SEASON): TEMPORARY (NON-VEGETABLE) CROP PRODUCTION - DRY SEASON
1H(DRY SEASON): TEMPORARY CROP PRODUCTION (VEGETABLE CROPS) - DRY SEASON
1B(DRY SEASON): TEMPORARY CROP DESTINATION - DRY SEASON
4(DRY SEASON): SEED AND PLANT USE - DRY SEASON
3C(DRY SEASON): INPUT USE - DRY SEASON
4A: LIVESTOCK IN STOCK
4B: CHANGE IN STOCK- LARGE AND MEDIUM-SIZED ANIMALS
4C: CHANGE IN STOCK-POULTRY
4G: MILKPRODUCTION
4H: EGG PRODUCTION
4I: OTHERLIVESTOCKPRODUCTS
4J:APIARYPRODUCTION (BEEKEEPING)
5A: FISH FARMING/AQUACULTUREPRODUCTION
6A: FISH HUNTING/CAPTURE
7A: FORESTRYPRODUCTION
9: LABOUR
2_GPS.PLOT GPS MEASUREMENT
99. END OFTHE SURVEY
| Start | End |
|---|---|
| 2022-07-06 | 2022-09-09 |
| Name | Affiliation | Abbreviation |
|---|---|---|
| National Bureau of Statistics | Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) | NBS |
Two rounds of monitoring exercise were carried out in addition to the remote monitoring of data collection. Trainers who also served as monitors, independent monitors, and coordinators participated in the monitoring exercise. They accompanied the field teams to monitor the kickstart of the survey for the first round of monitoring. The general roles of the monitors were to ensure proper compliance with the established rules and procedures by the enumerators, ensure that high-quality data were collected, ensure all farms within the household were measured, and suggest plausible solutions to problems where necessary.
The second round of monitoring was in the middle of the fieldwork. Monitors were further tasked with following up with states on the number and status of malfunctioning CAPI and GPS devices to promptly call for replacements, resolving technical issues, and visiting all the Corporate Farms that enumerators reported to have closed down, not in existence, could not be located, or had misclassification of activities to determine the veracity of their claims.
Training for the survey was conducted in three phases:
Training of Trainers (ToT) at the national level, held in Abuja. Participants included staff from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD), the National Population Commission (NPC), and Coordinators from the World Bank and FAO. The training lasted eight (8) days. Participants took two tests to assess their understanding of the training materials and their overall performance.
Training of Enumerators (ToE) at the state level. Participants included enumerators, NBS Zonal Controllers, NBS State Officers, staff from State Statistical Agencies and State Ministries of Agriculture, independent monitors, and coordinators. The training, which also lasted eight days, was implemented in two phases:
Teams were constituted in each state to carry out the fieldwork. Each team consisted of a team lead and a teammate, and covered an average of 20 Enumeration Areas (EAs). Some teams operated across more than one Local Government Area (LGA). Each enumerator interviewed five (5) households per EA over two and a half days. Cultivated plots belonging to sampled households that were not too large or located more than two hours from the dwelling were measured on the last day in the EA.
For corporate farms, workloads varied by state. On average, each enumerator covered about 50 corporate farms, depending on availability, and lodged approximately 15 questionnaires per week. Data collection for both household and corporate farm components lasted 50 days in total.
The coordination of the entire survey process was carried out by the survey management team in collaboration with stakeholders from participating MDAs, ensuring smooth field operations and adherence to established procedures.
For the Household and Producer Price questionnaires, data were collected electronically using CAPI devices, allowing for real-time online transmission. In contrast, enumerators engaged for the Corporate Farm component manually retrieved lodged questionnaires from establishments at agreed dates within the allotted timelines.
Data processing and analysis involved data cleaning, data analysis, data verification/validation, and table generation. The World Food Programme (WFP), the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and NBS carried out the data processing and analysis for both the household and corporate farms questionnaires. The corporate farm questionnaire involved manual editing as well as data entry.
STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE CONTROL
To safeguard the confidentiality of household information, rigorous anonymization techniques have been employed on the edited microdata. This process involved the removal of all direct identifiers, such as names, GPS locations, and specific addresses. Additionally, geographic information below the level of Local Government Area (LGA) has been excised to prevent any potential identification of individuals or households based on their location.
Furthermore, a masking technique (local suppression algorithms) has been implemented on the quasi-identifying variables using the R package sdcMicro. This ensures that even subtle patterns or combinations of variables that could potentially lead to re-identification are obfuscated, thereby enhancing the overall security and privacy of the dataset.
Given the complexity of the sample design, sampling errors were estimated through resampling approaches (Bootstrap/Jackknife).
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) | www.nigerianstat.gov.ng | [email protected] |
| Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? | Confidentiality declaration text |
|---|---|
| yes |
The confidentiality of the individual respondent is protected by law (Statistical Act 2007). This is published in the Official Gazette of the Federal republic of Nigeria No. 60 vol. 94 of 11th June 2007. See section 26 para.2. Punitive measures for breeches of confidentiality are outlined in section 28 of the same Act. |
A comprehensive data access policy has been developed by NBS, however section 27 of the Statistical Act 2007 outlines the data access obligation of data producers which includes the realease of properly anonymized micro data.
National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria, National Agricultural Sample Survey (NASS 2023)-v1.0
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
(c) 2024, National Bureau of Statistics
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prince Adeyemi Adeniran | National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | [email protected] | www.nigerianstat.gov.ng |
| Mr. Fafunmi E.A | National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | [email protected] | www.nigerianstat.gov.ng |
| Mr. David Babalola | National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | [email protected] | www.nigerianstat.gov.ng |
| Mr. Mustapha | National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | [email protected] | www.nigerianstat.gov.ng |
| Mr. Bishop Ohios | National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) | [email protected] | www.nigerianstat.gov.ng |
DDI_NGA_2023_NASS_v01_M_v01_A_ESS_FAO
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Bureau of Statistics | NBS | Federal Government of Nigeria | Producer |
| Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (fomerly Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) | FMAFS(fomerly FMARD) | Federal Government of Nigeria | Contributor |
| Statistics Division | ESS | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Metadata adapted for FAM |