National Agricultural Sample Survey 2023
Agricultural Household Survey
Nigeria, 2022
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA_2023_NASS_v01_M_v01_A_ESS
Producer(s)
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)
Collections
Metadata
Created on
Nov 03, 2025
Last modified
Nov 24, 2025
Page views
2167
- Data files
- 1_households
- 2_hh_member
- 3_Plot_mainSeason
- 4_Crop_mainSeason
- 5_Harvest_mainSeason
- 6_Permanent_Crops
- 7_Harvested_PermCrops
- 8_Seed_use_mainSeason
- 9_Input_use_mainSeason
- 10_Plots_drySeason
- 11_Crops_drySeason
- 12_Harvest_drySeason
- 13_Seed_use_drySeason
- 14_Input_use_drySeason
- 15_Livestock
- 16_Livestock_products
- 17_Fish_Farming
- 18_Fish_Capture
- 19_Forestry_production
- 20_Labor
- 21_Holdings
STATE (state_id)
Data file: 18_Fish_Capture
Overview
Valid:
13326
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
8
End:
9
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 37
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
STATE
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOKOTO | 58 |
0.4%
|
| 2 | ZAMFARA | 105 |
0.8%
|
| 3 | KATSINA | 25 |
0.2%
|
| 4 | JIGAWA | 458 |
3.4%
|
| 5 | YOBE | 139 |
1%
|
| 6 | BORNO | 138 |
1%
|
| 7 | ADAMAWA | 192 |
1.4%
|
| 8 | GOMBE | 6 |
0%
|
| 9 | BAUCHI | 235 |
1.8%
|
| 10 | KANO | 214 |
1.6%
|
| 11 | KADUNA | 130 |
1%
|
| 12 | KEBBI | 371 |
2.8%
|
| 13 | NIGER | 506 |
3.8%
|
| 14 | FCT | 90 |
0.7%
|
| 15 | NASARAWA | 335 |
2.5%
|
| 16 | PLATEAU | 38 |
0.3%
|
| 17 | TARABA | 216 |
1.6%
|
| 18 | BENUE | 146 |
1.1%
|
| 19 | KOGI | 684 |
5.1%
|
| 20 | KWARA | 98 |
0.7%
|
| 21 | OYO | 48 |
0.4%
|
| 22 | OSUN | 34 |
0.3%
|
| 23 | EKITI | 21 |
0.2%
|
| 24 | ONDO | 567 |
4.3%
|
| 25 | EDO | 74 |
0.6%
|
| 26 | ANAMBRA | 193 |
1.4%
|
| 27 | ENUGU | 10 |
0.1%
|
| 28 | EBONYI | 247 |
1.9%
|
| 29 | CROSS RIVER | 445 |
3.3%
|
| 30 | AKWA IBOM | 512 |
3.8%
|
| 31 | ABIA | 18 |
0.1%
|
| 32 | IMO | 32 |
0.2%
|
| 33 | RIVERS | 1058 |
7.9%
|
| 34 | BAYELSA | 4891 |
36.7%
|
| 35 | DELTA | 518 |
3.9%
|
| 36 | LAGOS | 374 |
2.8%
|
| 37 | OGUN | 100 |
0.8%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.