End-line Survey for the Impact Evaluation of the UN Joint Program Rural Women Economic Empowerment in Ethiopia, 2019
Ethiopia, 2019
Erdgin Mane, Susan Kaaria
Created on
October 15, 2021
Last modified
October 15, 2021
Page views
981
Download
58
Documentation in PDF
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
Identification
Survey ID Number
ETH_2019_UNJP-RWEE_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS
Title
End-line Survey for the Impact Evaluation of the UN Joint Program Rural Women Economic Empowerment in Ethiopia, 2019
Country
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Ethiopia | ETH |
Study type
Other Household Survey [hh/oth]
Series Information
The End-line Survey for Impact Evaluation of the UN Joint Program Rural Women Economic Empowerment in Ethiopia is the follow up to the Baseline Survey for Impact Evaluation of the UN Joint Program Rural Women Economic Empowerment in Ethiopia conducted in 2016. The purpose of this impact evaluation is to assess the effectiveness of the UNJP in empowering women economically.
Abstract
The UN Joint Programme focused on Rural Women’s Economic Empowerment (UNJP-RWEE) was launched in Ethiopia in 2014 by UN Women, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), the World Food Programme (WFP), and the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD). UNJP-RWEE was a five-year long initiative with the objective of accelerating the economic empowerment of rural women in the regions of Oroma and Afar. The project provided women with greater access to credit through women-run rural savings and credit cooperatives (RUSACCOs), as well as numeracy, literacy, finance, and business-development training; agricultural livestock and technology transfers; agricultural training; and community-run educational conversations in healthy eating choices and nutrition. To assess the extent to which the UNJP was effective in empowering women economically, an impact evaluation was conducted by the FAO in partnership with IFAD, and IFPRI. The FAO received a grant from GAAP2-IFPRI, facilitated by the Gates Foundation, to conduct a quasi-experimental impact evaluation with a difference-in-difference approach using a revised version of the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI), the Pro-WEAI. In Oromia, the list of beneficiaries including their Kebeles were retrieved from the baseline survey. In total 750 households were surveyed in the Oromia region. In Afar, the number of beneficiary households interviewed increased to 450, 250 of which were beneficiaries and the rest control. In addition to the 95 beneficiary household included at baseline, 155 new beneficiaries were included. Two additional control Kebeles were also included in Afar. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 389 women in the beneficiary communities and 358 women in the comparison communities, and 303 men in the beneficiary households and 314 men in the comparison communities. In all, there are 736 households where the same female respondent was administered the survey at both baseline and end-line.
Kind of Data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of Analysis
Households
Scope
Notes
The main topics covered in the household survey:
- Demographic characteristics of individuals living in the household
- Employment of youth and adults
- Dwelling characteristics and distance to various services
- Cash and In-kind transfers received by any household member from the government or an organization
- Training or capacity development received by any member of the household from the government or an organization.
- Shocks experienced by the household that resulted in significant reduction of income or consumption.
- Demographic characteristics of individuals living in the household
- Employment of youth and adults
- Dwelling characteristics and distance to various services
- Cash and In-kind transfers received by any household member from the government or an organization
- Training or capacity development received by any member of the household from the government or an organization.
- Shocks experienced by the household that resulted in significant reduction of income or consumption.
Keywords
| Keyword |
|---|
| Women's Empowerment |
| Women Empowerment Agriculture Index |
| Food Insecurity Experience Scale |
| Impact Evaluation |
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
Regional Coverage
Producers and sponsors
Primary investigators
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Erdgin Mane | FAO |
| Susan Kaaria | FAO |
Producers
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | International Organization | Technical Assistance |
| Mihret Alemu | FAO Ethiopia | Field Support |
| Tadele Ferede | Department of Economics at Addis Abeba University | Collaborator |
| Atlaw Alemu | Department of Economics at Addis Abeba University | Collaborator |
| Marya Hillesland | FAO | Collaborator |
| The United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women | International Organization | Collaborator |
| World Food Programme | International Organization | Collaborator |
| The International Food Policy Research Institute | International Organization | Collaborator |
Funding Agency/Sponsor
| Name | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| The International Food Policy Research Institute | IFPRI |
| The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN | FAO |
| Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | FAO |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
In the Oromia National Regional State, the same Woredas that were covered in the baseline are maintained. The list of project beneficiaries including their Kebeles was retrieved from the baseline survey which was conducted in 2017. In addition, control Kebeles were also obtained from the previous survey database. In the baseline, in the beneficiary communities, a random sample was drawn from the RUSSACO members, and from comparable kebeles. Six beneficiary kebeles were selected in Oromia: (1) Illuf Dirre and (2) Nannoo Chemerri in the Yaya Gulele Woreda; (3) Bura Adelle and (4) Wabe Burkitu in the Dodola Woreda; and (5) Abine Garmamme and (6) Annenno Shisho in the Adami Tulu Woreda. The comparison kebeles are adjacent communities in which the UNJP-RWEE does not operate but that are similar in size; have similar agricultural systems, livelihoods; and cultural norms, and thus are deemed valid counterfactuals. In Oromia, the control communities are: (1) Lemi; (2) Dedfe; (3) Haleko Gulenta Boke; (4) Werji Washingula; (5) Baressa; and (6) Keta Berenda. In Afar National Regional State, in addition to households interviewed at baseline, an additional 150 beneficiary households were interviewed in: (1) Asboda and (2) Boyina in the Dubti Woreda, and an additional 50 control households were interviewed from a newly selected Kebeles. The control communities were therefore (1) Hanikesen and (2) Aredo; (3) Gudmaydil; and (4) Gayder).
Weighting
No weights
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection
| Start | End |
|---|---|
| 2019-02-09 | 2019-02-16 |
Data Collection Mode
Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]
Data Processing
Other Processing
The dataset was anonymized by the Office of Chief Statistician. All direct identifiers have been removed and statistical disclosure control methods were applied where necessary, such as recoding and local suppressions.
Access policy
Confidentiality
The users shall not take any action with the purpose of identifying any individual entity (i.e. person, household, enterprise, etc.) in the micro dataset(s). If such a disclosure is made inadvertently, no use will be made of the information, and it will be reported immediately to FAO
Access conditions
Micro datasets disseminated by FAO shall only be allowed for research and statistical purposes. Any user which requests access working for a commercial company will not be granted access to any micro dataset regardless of their specified purpose. Users requesting access to any datasets must agree to the following minimal conditions:
- The micro dataset will only be used for statistical and/or research purposes;
- Any results derived from the micro dataset will be used solely for reporting aggregated information, and not for any specific individual entities or data subjects;
- The users shall not take any action with the purpose of identifying any individual entity (i.e. person, household, enterprise, etc.) in the micro dataset(s). If such a disclosure is made inadvertently, no use will be made of the information, and it will be reported immediately to FAO;
- The micro dataset cannot be re-disseminated by users or shared with anyone other than the individuals that are granted access to the micro dataset by FAO.
- The micro dataset will only be used for statistical and/or research purposes;
- Any results derived from the micro dataset will be used solely for reporting aggregated information, and not for any specific individual entities or data subjects;
- The users shall not take any action with the purpose of identifying any individual entity (i.e. person, household, enterprise, etc.) in the micro dataset(s). If such a disclosure is made inadvertently, no use will be made of the information, and it will be reported immediately to FAO;
- The micro dataset cannot be re-disseminated by users or shared with anyone other than the individuals that are granted access to the micro dataset by FAO.
Disclaimer and copyrights
Disclaimer
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses
Metadata production
DDI Document ID
DDI_ETH_2019_UNJP-RWEE_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS_FAO
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Chief Statistician | OCS | Food and Agriculture Organization | Metadata adapted for FAM |
| Natalia Piedrahita | Food and Agriculture Organization | Metadata producer |
DDI Document version
ETH_2019_UNJP-RWEE_v01_EN_M_v01_A_OCS